29 May 2021

Învierea domnului Constantin/Resurrection of Mr. Constantin


Constantin Reliu is a Romanian man in his 60s who found himself in a remarkable (though oddly not unique) situation: he had been declared dead in absentia while demonstrably still breathing, and he found the legal system had no interest in reversing the situation.  Cornel Brad’s 45-minute 2019 documentary accompanies him as he attempts to get his life back on track, teasing out the story from a not particularly articulate subject.  So, who is he, and what brought about this sorry situation in which he found himself?

Reliu, from Bârlad in north-eastern Romania, is a cook by profession.  Leaving his family behind, he had moved to Turkey in 1992 to work and had been happy despite being bedridden for many months with a number of injuries following the 1999 Turkish earthquake.  That year was also the last time he had last seen his family and he had had no contact with them subsequently.  Unfortunately, he was caught up in a police sweep following the 2016 failed coup and deported to Romania by the Turkish authorities as his documents had expired.  He concedes he would have purchased forged documents in Turkey had he got round to it and stayed there indefinitely.

Planning to renew his documents and return to Turkey, what he only found out when he was back in Romania was that in 2013 his wife had requested the issue of a death certificate for him as the last known record was in 1999, and it was presumed he had died in the earthquake.  If it had not been for the deportation he might never have known what had happened, continuing his life in Turkey in blissful ignorance of his demise.  The practical consequence was that in Romania he found it impossible to earn an honest living, leaving him penniless, as employers would not hire him without ID, and for the same reason he could not receive state support.  The decision left him in legal limbo.

His plight generated a great deal of publicity, but the film gets behind the bald newspaper statements to hear his side of the story (though not his wife’s).  It describes his difficult homecoming in 2016, in poor health and out of contact with his family.  His wife was in a relationship in Italy he claimed was bigamous (which as he had been declared dead seems unlikely), and his daughter insulted him and refused to speak to him as she blamed him, perhaps with some justification, for deserting her. It’s all a bit like a reverse version of My Favourite Wife, with Reliu in the Irene Dunne part, though here it is Reliu who got the push, not the new spouse.

Back in his home town after almost a quarter of a century abroad, he looks lonely and lost, with his life on hold.  Fortunately he is able to stay in the family home in Bârlad, but he has trouble finding enough money to subsist on, and spends much of his time trying to obtain funds from friends.  He cannot afford medical treatment, though kind-hearted medical staff assist him.  He concludes that when he was in Turkey his family did not really care whether he was alive or dead, and when he got back to Romania he realised nobody was happy he had shown up.

He claims his wife acted deceitfully by having him declared dead, so she could acquire his assets; he implies that she knew he was probably alive, but a declaration of death was more convenient than divorce.  How she would know this he does not say.  He does say he had bought her many things which she had sold, she had put the flat in her name, sold the contents and then left for Italy.  Unfortunately for her, he continues, his turning up had ruined her plans, whereas if she had not had him declared dead, he would have gone quietly back to Turkey as soon as he had made the arrangements.

An obvious question is why Reliu did not contact his family during all those years in Turkey, and as he settles some scores with his wife a fuller picture of his motives emerges.  He alludes to how he cooled off in the marriage after a few months when he learned about her affairs, and he found her difficult to live with.  He would leave for periods, but after only a few days when he was back home she would ask when he was leaving again, bringing home lovers while he slept on the sofa (allegedly, one should add).

When he came home in July1999 he found his wife still carrying on.  Chagrined, he felt his best revenge was not violence or divorce but to let her suffer alone, though it doesn’t sound as though she was suffering too much.  He probably thought remaining incommunicado would prevent her marrying again, not dreaming what she would do.  As a form of punishment for an errant wife his scheme backfired spectacularly, and to a large extent he has been the author of his own misfortune.  He should have just divorced her, like most people do when their marriages break down, though he does not help his case as the injured party when asked what his major vice is, and he replies, surprisingly, ‘sex’ (Brad probably assumed he would say the cigarettes which must eat up a significant chunk of his disposable income).  There may be dimensions to the situation not covered by the film.

Naturally Reliu wanted to reverse the decision declaring him dead, but he found it was not as straightforward as going to court and pointing out he really wasn’t dead, and they could pinch him if they wanted to make sure.  His first attempt in March 2018 to have himself reinstated among the quick failed because the court upheld his status as dead, even though he was standing in front of them.  Apparently, this was because he was too late filing his claim, as if an artificial time limit took priority over the rights both of a citizen and of common sense.  It was a bizarre triumph of bureaucracy over humanity, content to perpetuate Reliu’s zombie-like status to keep the paperwork in order.

(Another example of state-sanctioned idiocy in Romania came a few days after that decision, when Valerian Vasiliu was given his driving licence back after a successful appeal against a speeding conviction, even though he had died in the meantime.  There seems to be a certain inflexibility in the Romanian judicial system which finds it difficult to back-pedal decisions even when they are shown to be risible.)

But, finally, Reliu had some luck.  The film was symbolically shot over Easter 2018, one resurrection prefiguring another, and end titles note he was finally declared legally alive after a second attempt in July 2018.  A wrinkle of that situation is his wife’s marital status, though as she could argue she remarried in good faith having a document to prove her first husband was deceased, it seems unlikely a bigamy charge would stick.  In any case, we are informed that Reliu finally filed for divorce, and asked for punitive damages, though on what grounds was not made clear.  At the time of making the film his wife and daughter had only had contact through lawyers.  Sadly, you know that being resurrected may ease his financial worries, but he is still not going to be a happy man.

The film is available on the Cinepub YouTube platform:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VPQ22h_k8I&t=692s